We've built AI agents that write, fix, review and document software across the delivery lifecycle, augmenting our engineers, never replacing them. A human stays accountable for everything that ships.
How the agents triage, fix, review and document, with a human accountable at every gate.
Building and maintaining software ties up senior engineers in repetitive work, fixing bugs, reviewing pull requests, and keeping documentation current. It's hard to move fast and hold quality at the same time.
Language-model-driven agents handle meaningful steps of the lifecycle inside a structured, deterministic process, with humans in control of what ships.
Built for a Course Feasibility programme at an educational institution and now deployable inside client organisations.
Pulls the issue, recreates the problem on real systems, ships a fix and tests, gets a second-model cross-check, then opens a PR or escalates with the full reasoning trail.
Read-only. Reads the diff in context and checks correctness, quality, architecture and security, then posts findings straight back to GitHub.
Scheduled. Keeps the codebase index, architecture docs and lessons-learned index current, so later agents start from accumulated experience.
Invoked when the primary agent is stuck or a second implementation pass helps, a different model has different blind spots.
Two views: the high-level workflow across the whole support and development lifecycle, and a closer look at how the Bug-Fix agent decides. A human stays accountable at every gate.
Beyond development, the same patterns run day-to-day operations, each agent has one job, a fixed action boundary, and produces a proposal. Nothing acts on its own.
| Agent | What it does | Action boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Health Check | Runs scheduled checks across the estate; publishes an exception-only report. | Read-only telemetry |
| Triage | Reads the ticket and telemetry; writes enrichment fields only, behind approval. | Read-only ticket & telemetry |
| Bug-Fixer | Reproduces and drafts a fix for an approved case. | Draft PR / patch only |
| Reviewer | Reads the proposed change; posts findings on correctness, quality, architecture and security. | Read-only review |
| Knowledge-Refresher | Drafts lesson and runbook updates for approval. | Read / write · drafts |
Each stage produces a typed artefact. On failure it auto-corrects, tries again, then escalates to a human with the full trail.
Converts a ticket into a typed, testable specification.
Executes the task graph across parallel, isolated worktrees.
LiveFour reviewers run in parallel, correctness, quality, architecture and self-review.
LiveTests, security scan, canary smoke and human sign-off at every boundary.
Every run leaves the system smarter, lessons indexed and consulted next time.
LiveAgents augment the team; a person is accountable for everything that ships.
Agents that act don't review themselves, a clean separation of duties.
Low-confidence work is flagged and reassigned with the reasoning trail attached.
Every change writes a structured lesson that future runs consult before they start.
Every tool call, model call and decision is logged, full lineage in Azure SQL.
End-to-end on the Azure stack, no re-procurement or second vendor.
A live view of our Bug-Fix, PR Review and Knowledge Refresh agents, completed fixes, resolution breakdown, daily merge volume and open escalations.
| Bug | Status | Area | Confidence | PR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFMP2-611 | fix_failed | — | — | — |
We can stand up the same agents inside your delivery lifecycle, safely, observably, and with your engineers in control.
Get in touch →